15. We, as a congregation, are not required to take responsibility for the physical needs
in the unbelieving community around us. We do have a responsibility to care for
the needs of those within our congregation (Matt. 25:34-40; Acts 6:1-6; Gal. 6:2,
10; James 2:15-16; I John 3:17-19) though even within the church, there were
further qualifications (e.g., II Thess. 3:10; I Tim. 5:3-16). Paul’s counsel to
Timothy (in I Tim. 5:3-16) about which widows to care for seems to indicate that
the list was intended for Christian widows. One qualification seemed to be lack
of alternative sources of support. Thus the instruction that family members
should care for the needy first, if at all possible, shows the kind of prioritization
of allowing for families—even of unbelievers—to provide support so that the
church wouldn’t have to do it (I Tim. 5:16). We can extrapolate from this to
conclude that support that could be provided from outside the church (for
instance, from the state) should be preferred over using church funds, thus freeing
church funds to be used elsewhere.
16. We should use historical examples and arguments for taking responsibility for our
communities with care. Most people in the European past had established
churches (also true many places in America before the 1840’s). Therefore the
example of Calvin, the puritans, Edwards, etc. is less directly applicable than may
first appear. They were not in modern pluralistic societies with large groups of
people calling themselves non-Christians.
17. Many texts which seem to promote the idea of taking responsibility for our
community’s physical well-being (e.g., Micah 6:8, Matt. 25, Gal. 6 & I John 3)
are about our charity to members of the covenant community, believers, not non-
Christian members of the community at large.
18. We are not forbidden from choosing to alleviate physical needs outside our
congregation as a witness to the Gospel (e.g., providing computers to local
schools, disaster relief, etc.). (contra a wrong idea of the spirituality of the
church)
19. We have the freedom to choose particular actions for the welfare of our community
as a witness to them directly, or more remotely by cooperating with other
congregations and Christians in the formation of denominations, educational
institutions, and a great variety of boards, charities and other organizations.
20. We should never mistake social action or mercy ministries (e.g., caring for the poor,
soup kitchens, etc.) for evangelism (though it may be a means to it).
21. We should expect our members to be involved in a wide variety of good works
(Prov. 19:17; 21:3; Luke 10:25-37; Acts 9:36; Heb. 13:1-3; James 1:27), some of
which we may choose to hold up as examples to other members. This can be
done without leading the congregation as a whole to own or support those
particular ministries (whether by congregationally funding or staffing them). We
personally can set an example of care for others. So John Wesley “began the year
Mark Dever
Sovereign Grace Pastors Conference
The Pastor & Community
www.SovereignGraceMinistries.org
© 2009
4
1785, by spending five days in walking through London, often ankle deep in
sludge and melting snow, to beg 200 pounds, which he employed in purchasing
clothing for the poor. He visited the destitute in their own houses, ‘to see with his
own eyes what their wants were, and how they might be effectually relieved.’”
Wesley was 81 years old! (L. Tyerman, Life and Times of Wesley (Harper &
Bros; 1872), III.458).
Mark Dever’s 35 points (cont’d):
15. We, as a congregation, are not required to take responsibility for the physical needs in the unbelieving community around us. We do have a responsibility to care for the needs of those within our congregation (Matt. 25:34-40; Acts 6:1-6; Gal. 6:2, 10; James 2:15-16; I John 3:17-19) though even within the church, there were further qualifications (e.g., II Thess. 3:10; I Tim. 5:3-16). Paul’s counsel to Timothy (in I Tim. 5:3-16) about which widows to care for seems to indicate that the list was intended for Christian widows. One qualification seemed to be lack of alternative sources of support. Thus the instruction that family members should care for the needy first, if at all possible, shows the kind of prioritization of allowing for families—even of unbelievers—to provide support so that the church wouldn’t have to do it (I Tim. 5:16). We can extrapolate from this to conclude that support that could be provided from outside the church (for instance, from the state) should be preferred over using church funds, thus freeing church funds to be used elsewhere.
16. We should use historical examples and arguments for taking responsibility for our communities with care. Most people in the European past had established churches (also true many places in America before the 1840’s). Therefore the example of Calvin, the puritans, Edwards, etc. is less directly applicable than may first appear. They were not in modern pluralistic societies with large groups of people calling themselves non-Christians.
17. Many texts which seem to promote the idea of taking responsibility for our community’s physical well-being (e.g., Micah 6:8, Matt. 25, Gal. 6 & I John 3) are about our charity to members of the covenant community, believers, not non-Christian members of the community at large.
18. We are not forbidden from choosing to alleviate physical needs outside our congregation as a witness to the Gospel (e.g., providing computers to local schools, disaster relief, etc.). (contra a wrong idea of the spirituality of the church)
19. We have the freedom to choose particular actions for the welfare of our community as a witness to them directly, or more remotely by cooperating with other congregations and Christians in the formation of denominations, educational institutions, and a great variety of boards, charities and other organizations.
20. We should never mistake social action or mercy ministries (e.g., caring for the poor, soup kitchens, etc.) for evangelism (though it may be a means to it).
21. We should expect our members to be involved in a wide variety of good works (Prov. 19:17; 21:3; Luke 10:25-37; Acts 9:36; Heb. 13:1-3; James 1:27), some of which we may choose to hold up as examples to other members. This can be done without leading the congregation as a whole to own or support those particular ministries (whether by congregationally funding or staffing them). We personally can set an example of care for others. So John Wesley “began the year 1785, by spending five days in walking through London, often ankle deep in sludge and melting snow, to beg 200 pounds, which he employed in purchasing clothing for the poor. He visited the destitute in their own houses, ‘to see with his own eyes what their wants were, and how they might be effectually relieved.’” Wesley was 81 years old! (L. Tyerman, Life and Times of Wesley (Harper & Bros; 1872), III.458).